Reimbursement of expenses part of taxable value: ST
In a normal course of service industry, a service
provider charges an amount for providing the services along with service tax
which is paid by the service receiver. Such service tax is calculated and paid
according to the service tax provisions contained in the Finance Act 1994, as
amended thereafter. It is hereby required to note that, the value of services
provided also includes the value of actual expenses incurred like Railway
freight, photocopy expenses etc., while providing the main service.
What does term “Reimbursement of
expenses” mean?
The term has been explained by Hon’ble CESTAT in
case of SRI BHAGAVATHY TRADERS vs. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, COCHIN [2011
(24) S.T.R. 290 (Tri. - LB)], wherein scope of term ‘Reimbursement’ in the
context of service has been analysed in following terms:“Only when the service
recipient has an obligation legal or contractual to pay certain amount to any
third party and the said amount is paid by the service provider on behalf of the
service recipient, the question of reimbursing the expenses incurred on behalf
of the recipient shall arise. For example, when rent for premises is sought to
be claimed as reimbursement, it has to be seen whether there is an agreement
between the landlord of the premises and the service recipient and, therefore,
the service recipient is under obligation for paying the rent to the landlord
and that the service provider has paid the said amount on behalf of the
recipient. The claim for reimbursement of salary to staff, similarly has to be
considered as to whether the staff were actually employed by the service
recipient at agreed wages and the service recipient was under obligation to pay
the salary and it was out of expediency, the provider paid the same and sought
reimbursement from the service recipient. The claim for reimbursement towards
rent for premises, telephone charges, stationery charges, etc. amounts to a
claim by the service provider that they can render such services in vacuum. What
are costs for inputs services and inputs used in rendering services cannot be
treated as reimbursable costs. There is no justification or legal authority to
artificially split the cost towards providing services partly as cost of
services and the rest as reimbursable expenses.”
Whether reimbursement of expenses under
ST levy as per Statue
Now, the issue discussed herewith that, is the
law really makes the reimbursement of expenses out of preview of service tax in
spite of introduction of Rule 5(1). In order to make some opinion on the same,
provisions of section 67 prior needs to be analyzed.
Section 67 was introduced vide Finance Act 1994,
where it was provided that, the service tax shall be levied on the gross amount
charged by the service provider for providing taxable service. Section 67 was
later amended in the year 2006 vide notification no. 12/2006, where rules
(Service tax (determination of value) rules) were introduced for determining the
value of service, the same has been discussed in the following paras. The
importance of bringing in discussion, the provision contained in section 67
prior to amendment made in 2006, is to analyze the intention of the government
regarding the valuation of service, before and after amendment. Relevant part of
Section 67 (prior to amendment in the year 2006) can be read as: -
67. Valuation of taxable services for charging
service tax.—For the purposes of this Chapter, the value of any taxable service
shall be the gross amount charged by the service provider for such service
provided or to be provided by him.
Explanation 1.—For the removal of doubts, it is
hereby declared that the value of a taxable service, as the case may be,
includes,— (a) the aggregate of commission or brokerage charged by a broker on
the sale or purchase of securities including the commission or brokerage paid by
the stock-broker to any sub-broker;
----------------------------------------------------------- but does not
include—
(i) initial deposit made by the subscriber at the
time of application for telephone connection or pager or facsimile (FAX) or
telegraph or telex or for leased circuit;
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aforesaid section, clearly states that, service
tax shall be levied on the gross amount charged by the service provider and also
for bringing in more clarity over some costs, explanations have been inserted as
mentioned supra which clarifies certain inclusive and non inclusive part of
costs in the value of service. On careful analyses, of the section 67 including
the explanations made therein, it can be easily understood that, the expenses
incurred by the service provider while providing the main service which are
reimbursed by the service receiver later, are nowhere excluded. And also,
provision mentioned in section 67 is also self explanatory as the word used in
said section are gross amount charged. Therefore, any amount charged including
expenses incurred by the service provider under the invoice, whether such
charges are being stated separately or not, shall be deemed to be part of value
of service provided and hence chargeable to service tax.
Position on and after the introduction of
Service tax(determination of value) Rules, 2006
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause(aa)
of sub section(2) of section 94 of the Finance Act. 1994(32 of 1994), the
Central Government amended Section 67, w.e.f. 18th April 2006, with the new
section 67 and notified the service tax (determination of value) Rules, 2006
under the section 67 vide notification no. 12/2006. It is hereby required to
note that, prior to the amendment, value of taxable services was defined under
section 67 as “gross amount” charged by the service provider as discussed supra,
but now the value the value of taxable services will be governed by section 67
read with the service tax(determination of value) Rules,2006. Section 67 and the
rules notified there under, which provide for valuation of services for charging
service tax under different situations. Now, as per the provisions of the
service tax(determination of value) Rules, 2006, service tax is leviable on all
the expenditures or costs incurred by the service provider in the course of
providing a taxable service, which includes reimbursement of traveling expenses
or the other amount such as photocopies, telephone expenses etc. The same can be
analyzed by referring to Rule 5(1) of the said rules where it has been provided
that: (
1) Where any expenditure or costs are incurred by
the service provider in the course of providing taxable service, all such
expenditure or costs shall be treated as consideration for the taxable service
provided or to be provided and shall be included in the value for the purpose of
charging service tax on the said service.
Also, the government in its circular no.
B1/4/2006-TRU dated 19th April 2006, clarified that “all expenditures or costs
incurred by the service provider in the course of providing a taxable service
form an integral part of the taxable value and are includible in the value. It
is not relevant that various expenditure or costs are separately indicated in
the invoice or bill issued by the service provider to his client."
Services provided in the capacity of Pure
Agent is not taxable
There could be situations where the client of the
service provider specially engages the service provider, as his agent, to
contract with a third party for supply of any goods or services on his behalf.
In those cases, such goods or services so procured are treated as supply to the
client rather than to the contracting agent. The service provider in such case
incurs the expenditure purely on behalf of his client in his capacity as agent
of the client. Amount paid to the third party by the service provider as a pure
agent of his client can be treated as reimbursable expenditure and not
includable in the taxable value. However, if the service provider act as
undisclosed agent i.e. acting in his own name without disclosing that he is
actually acting as an agent of his client, he cannot claim the expenditure
incurred by him as reimbursable expenditure.
Such an agent is termed as ‘pure agent’ which
means a person who:-
a) Enter into contractual relationship with the
recipient of service to act as his pure agent to incur certain cost/expenses in
the course of providing taxable service.
b) Neither intends to hold nor holds any title of
goods/services so procured/provided as pure agent of recipient of services.
c) Does not use such goods/services so
procured.
d) Receive only actual amount incurred to procure
such goods/services. The expenditure or costs incurred by the service provider
as a pure agent of the recipient of service shall be excluded from the value of
taxable service if all the following conditions are satisfied, namely;
Rule 5(2) (2)
Subject to the provisions of sub-rule (1), the
expenditure or costs incurred by the service provider as a pure agent of the
recipient of service, shall be excluded from the value of the taxable service if
all the following conditions are satisfied, namely:-
a) the service provider acts as a pure agent of
the recipient of service when he makes payment to third party for the
goods/services procured;
b) the recipient of service receives and uses the
goods or services so procured by the service provider in his capacity as pure
agent of the recipient of service;
c) the recipient of service is liable to make
payment to the third party;
d) the recipient of service authorizes the
service provider to make payment on his behalf;
e) the recipient of service knows that the goods
and services for which payment has been made by the service provider shall be
provided by the third party;
f) the payment made by the service provider on
behalf of the recipient of service has been separately indicated in the invoice
issued by the service provider to the recipient of service;
g) the service provider recovers from the
recipient of service only such amount as has been paid by him to the third
party; and
h) the goods or services procured by the service
provider from the third party as a pure agent of the recipient of service are in
addition to the services he provides on his own account.
Reimbursement of Expenses cannot made
part of Taxable value: Judiciary
However, keeping aside all the provisions made
under Service tax(determination of value) Rules 2006, circulars issued in this
regard, FAQ’s etc., the Hon’ble High court took a different stand in one of the
landmark judgments of M/s Intercontinental consultants & Technorates
(P.) Ltd. Vs Union of India [2012] 28 taxmann.com 213 (Delhi) dated 30th
November 2012, where the Hon'ble High court held that the Rule 5 (1)
which provides for inclusion of the expenditure or costs incurred by the service
provider in the course of providing the taxable service in the value for the
purpose of charging service tax is ultra vires sections 66 and 67 and travels
much beyond the scope of those sections. To that extent it has to be struck down
as bad in law.
The Judiciary decided the case on
following grounds:
Section 67 quantifies the charge of service tax
provided in Section 66, which is the charging section. Further, section 67(as
reproduced in paras above), authorizes the determination of the value of the
taxable service for the purpose of charging service tax under Section 66 as the
gross amount charged by the service provider for such service provided or to be
provided by him, in a case where the consideration for the service is money. The
underlined words i.e. "for such service" are important in the setting of Section
66 and 67. The charge of service tax under section 66 is on the value of taxable
services. The taxable services are listed in section 65(105). It is only the
value of such service that is to say, that can be brought to charge and nothing
more. The quantification of the value of the service can therefore never exceed
the gross amount charged by the service provider for the service provided by
him. It is pertinent to note herewith that, section 66 levies service tax at a
particular rate on the value of taxable services and section 67 (1) makes the
provisions of the section subject to the provisions of Chapter V, which includes
Section 66. This is a clear mandate that the value of taxable services for
charging service tax has to be in consonance with Section 66 which levies a tax
only on the taxable service and nothing else. There is thus in built mechanism
to ensure that only the taxable service shall be evaluated under the provisions
of 67. Clause (i) of sub-section (1) of Section 67 provides that the value of
the taxable service shall be the gross amount charged by the service provider
"for such service". Further, reading Section 66 and Section 67 (1) (i) together
and harmoniously, it seems that in the valuation of the taxable service, nothing
more and nothing less than the consideration paid as quid pro quo for the
service can be brought to charge.Further, Hon'ble High Court in the matter of
M/s Intercontinental consultants & Technorates (P.) Ltd. Vs Union of India
[2012] 28 taxmann.com 213 (Delhi) dated 30th November 2012 also clears that:
"Even if the rule has been made under section 94
of the Act which provides for delegated legislation and authorizes the Central
Government to make rules by notification in the official gazette, such rules can
only be made "for carrying out the provisions of this Chapter" i.e. Chapter V of
the Act which provides for the levy, quantification and collection of the
service tax. The power to make rules can never exceed or go beyond the section
which provides for the charge or collection of the service tax. "
To conclude the whole stand taken by the High
court in the aforementioned case, it was said that, the Rule 5(1) of the Service
Tax(Determination of value) Rules 2006, cannot travel beyond the section 67 as
under such rule, it has been stated that, the value of taxable service shall
also include the expenses incurred, whereas the section 67 only talks about
actual value of such service and nothing more or less. Hence, held such rule to
be ultra vires section 66 and 67 of the Act ibid, and therefore has no statutory
relevance.
Whether to rely on the judgment given by
the Hon’ble High court or should comply with provisions under Rule 5(1)
Keeping aside all the provisions made under
Service tax(determination of value) Rules 2006, circulars issued in this regard,
FAQ’s etc., the Hon'ble high court took a different view as explained supra.
However, there are still disputes at various levels whether service tax is
leviable on the reimbursement of out of pocket expenses. Ministry of finance in
their education guide, para 10.1.6 has clarified as under: - “10.1.6:- The
service recipient would need to discharge liability only on the payments made by
him. Thus the assessable value would be calculated on such payments done (Free
of cost material supplied and out of pocket expenses reimbursed or incurred on
behalf of the service provider need to be included in the assessable value in
terms of Valuation Rules.”
Government, has always covered reimbursement of
expenses under the service tax levy, whether it was pre or post 2006 era. And
also, to clarify the view the, government introduced rule(5) under Service tax(
determination of value) rules 2006, where, service tax levy on reimbursement of
expenses was specifically explained. Therefore, it is advisable to levy service
tax on reimbursement of expenses, as the view taken by Hon’ble High court of
Kolkata as mentioned is a subject matter of litigation and can be appealed
against in the supreme court.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe and Be Updated Yourself
♥ Pulla Harsha Vardhan ♥
© pullaharshavardhan.blogspot.in ©
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe and Be Updated Yourself
♥ Pulla Harsha Vardhan ♥
© pullaharshavardhan.blogspot.in ©
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't Miss Another Post
Stay up to Date with Our Email News Latter Just Subscribe our Blog via email & Get Daily Updates. We Promise that Your email will be kept private and never shared with anyone.
I respect your privacy. You may unsubscribe at any time with just one click.
Get Free Email Updates to your Inbox!
|
Reimbursement of expenses part of taxable value: ST
Reviewed by Unknown
on
2:08:00 PM
Rating:
No comments